360 Virtual Tour Pricing Explained
The price of a 360 virtual tour is set by seven variables, and panorama count is only one of them. The largest single factor in what we quote is whether the space exists: a photographed tour is a capture and a build, while a rendered tour of an unbuilt space is a modeling project. We do not quote a tour without knowing which of those it is.
Anyone quoting a price from a square footage figure alone is guessing, and the guess resolves later as a change order.
Here is what actually moves the number on 360 virtual tours, so you can compare proposals on the same terms.
The variable that dominates everything
Photographed or rendered. A finished space is a scheduled capture session and a tour build. An unbuilt space has to be modeled, materials assigned, lighting resolved and every panorama rendered, which is a different order of work and a different budget entirely.
Mixed projects exist, where a completed amenity is photographed and the unbuilt units are rendered. Those need both scopes stated separately.
What sets the price
| Variable | Technical constraint | When it is the right call to spend here |
|---|---|---|
| Photographed versus rendered | Rendering requires a model, finishes and lighting; capture requires access | Render only when the space does not exist yet or is unrecognizably different |
| Panorama count | Each position is capture or render time plus stitching and linking | Cover distinct space types, not every room of the same type |
| Access conditions | Occupied, secured or operating spaces slow capture and force odd hours | Unavoidable in healthcare, hotels and occupied buildings |
| Hotspot and information depth | Every label, measurement and embedded document is authored by hand | Worth it where the tour must answer questions without a person present |
| Navigation design | A floor plan map with linked positions is a build, not a setting | Necessary above roughly a dozen panoramas or across multiple floors |
| Platform and embed requirements | Some listing platforms and intranets impose their own constraints | Confirm before build; retrofitting is more expensive than planning |
| Revision rounds and updates | Recapture needs another visit; re-render needs the model reopened | Buy a defined update allowance if you expect the space to change soon after delivery |
Why this page explains pricing instead of quoting it
A single vacant retail suite photographed on a weekday and a fifty position rendered tour of an unbuilt hospital wing are both called a 360 virtual tour. A published figure would be badly wrong for one of them, and quoting a range wide enough to cover both tells you nothing.
What we can do quickly is tell you which of these variables your project actually triggers, usually from a floor plan and two sentences about the space.
Four questions before you compare two quotes
How many panorama positions, and are they listed. Is it photographed or rendered, and if rendered, from whose model. What information and navigation is authored, or is it a bare set of linked spheres. What happens when the space changes, and is that inside the price.
Two proposals that answer those four differently are not competing offers. They are different products.
The cheapest tour is usually the one nobody uses
A bare panorama set with no labels, no plan and no navigation gets embedded, gets a handful of views and gets quietly forgotten. The authored parts are the parts that make a prospect stay, and they are the parts stripped out to hit a low number.
Comparing proposals? Send us the floor plan and we will tell you which variables your project actually triggers.
How to start
Answer one question first: does the space exist today. Everything else in the quote follows from that.
Related reading: rendered versus photographed tours covers that decision in full, hotspots and navigation covers the authored layer, restaurants covers a small scope, and senior living communities covers a large one.
Send us a floor plan and we will scope against these variables, not a square footage guess.