← Back to Blog

360 Virtual Tour Pricing Explained

Two 360 virtual tour proposals compared side by side on a desk

The price of a 360 virtual tour is set by seven variables, and panorama count is only one of them. The largest single factor in what we quote is whether the space exists: a photographed tour is a capture and a build, while a rendered tour of an unbuilt space is a modeling project. We do not quote a tour without knowing which of those it is.

Anyone quoting a price from a square footage figure alone is guessing, and the guess resolves later as a change order.

Here is what actually moves the number on 360 virtual tours, so you can compare proposals on the same terms.

The variable that dominates everything

Photographed or rendered. A finished space is a scheduled capture session and a tour build. An unbuilt space has to be modeled, materials assigned, lighting resolved and every panorama rendered, which is a different order of work and a different budget entirely.

Mixed projects exist, where a completed amenity is photographed and the unbuilt units are rendered. Those need both scopes stated separately.

What sets the price

VariableTechnical constraintWhen it is the right call to spend here
Photographed versus renderedRendering requires a model, finishes and lighting; capture requires accessRender only when the space does not exist yet or is unrecognizably different
Panorama countEach position is capture or render time plus stitching and linkingCover distinct space types, not every room of the same type
Access conditionsOccupied, secured or operating spaces slow capture and force odd hoursUnavoidable in healthcare, hotels and occupied buildings
Hotspot and information depthEvery label, measurement and embedded document is authored by handWorth it where the tour must answer questions without a person present
Navigation designA floor plan map with linked positions is a build, not a settingNecessary above roughly a dozen panoramas or across multiple floors
Platform and embed requirementsSome listing platforms and intranets impose their own constraintsConfirm before build; retrofitting is more expensive than planning
Revision rounds and updatesRecapture needs another visit; re-render needs the model reopenedBuy a defined update allowance if you expect the space to change soon after delivery

Why this page explains pricing instead of quoting it

A single vacant retail suite photographed on a weekday and a fifty position rendered tour of an unbuilt hospital wing are both called a 360 virtual tour. A published figure would be badly wrong for one of them, and quoting a range wide enough to cover both tells you nothing.

What we can do quickly is tell you which of these variables your project actually triggers, usually from a floor plan and two sentences about the space.

Four questions before you compare two quotes

How many panorama positions, and are they listed. Is it photographed or rendered, and if rendered, from whose model. What information and navigation is authored, or is it a bare set of linked spheres. What happens when the space changes, and is that inside the price.

Two proposals that answer those four differently are not competing offers. They are different products.

The cheapest tour is usually the one nobody uses

A bare panorama set with no labels, no plan and no navigation gets embedded, gets a handful of views and gets quietly forgotten. The authored parts are the parts that make a prospect stay, and they are the parts stripped out to hit a low number.

Comparing proposals? Send us the floor plan and we will tell you which variables your project actually triggers.

How to start

Answer one question first: does the space exist today. Everything else in the quote follows from that.

Related reading: rendered versus photographed tours covers that decision in full, hotspots and navigation covers the authored layer, restaurants covers a small scope, and senior living communities covers a large one.

Send us a floor plan and we will scope against these variables, not a square footage guess.